Diagnostic accuracy of an antigen-based point-of-care test versus nucleic acid amplification testing for genital trichomoniasis among pregnant women attending antenatal care facilities in Zambia

Sumire Sorano ORCID logo ; Enesia Banda Chaponda ; Massimo Mirandola ; Ephraim Chikwanda ; Vivian Mwewa ; Joyce M Mulenga ; Mike Chaponda ; Ludovica Ghilardi ORCID logo ; Emma M Harding-Esch ORCID logo ; Chris Smith ORCID logo ; +9 more... Mitsuaki Matsui ; Daniel Chandramohan ORCID logo ; Daniel Schröder ; Daniel Golparian ; Mohamed Mahmoud Ali ; Karel Blondeel ; Magnus Unemo ; Igor Toskin ; R Matthew Chico ORCID logo ; (2025) Diagnostic accuracy of an antigen-based point-of-care test versus nucleic acid amplification testing for genital trichomoniasis among pregnant women attending antenatal care facilities in Zambia. BMC infectious diseases, 24 (S1). p. 1482. ISSN 1471-2334 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-025-10698-9
Copy

Abstract

Background

Infection with Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) is the most prevalent curable sexually transmitted infection (STI) globally and is associated with prelabour rupture of membranes, preterm delivery, and low birthweight. Point-of-care (POC) testing for TV during pregnancy may facilitate rapid antenatal case detection and treatment. This study, part of the World Health Organization’s global ProSPeRo study, aimed to evaluate the performance of OSOM® Trichomonas Rapid Test, an antigen-based POC test, against a reference nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) among pregnant women in Zambia. We also assessed the operational characteristics and patient acceptability of the POC test, within the context of WHO’s target product profiles for STI POC tests.

Methods

We enrolled pregnant women attending four health centres in Nchelenge, Zambia, for antenatal care between 15 February and 26 May 2023. Vaginal swabs for the TV POC test and a reference NAAT (Aptima® Trichomonas vaginalis assay) were obtained. POC test results were read independently by two study staff members. Study staff filled a questionnaire on the operational characteristics of the POC test, and participants were asked about their willingness to wait for results.

Results

Paired POC and reference test samples were collected from 1,015 participants. Overall, 23.0% (233/1015) tested positive for TV by NAAT, and 15.3% (155/1015) tested positive by the POC test, with three inconclusive results. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the POC test were 66.4% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 57.7–74.1%) and 99.6% (95% CI: 98.8–99.9%), respectively. Sensitivity was higher among those with TV-associated symptoms compared to those without (83.6% versus 60.4%, relative ratio 1.39, 95% CI 1.14–1.68). Inter-rater agreement was 99.7% (Cohen’s Kappa 0.989). The study staff (n = 14) found the test easy to use and interpret, with most staff (12/14) reporting results were available within 25 min.

Conclusion

Overall, the TV POC test showed lower sensitivity than WHO’s 85% target, but exceeded the 99% specificity target. Among symptomatic pregnant women, sensitivity nearly reached the WHO target. The assay was user-friendly, required minimal training, and delivered results quickly. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal antenatal settings for this technology.

Trial registration

PACTR202302766902029.

picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
Sorano-etal-2025-Diagnostic-accuracy-of-an-antigen-based-point-of-care-test-versus-nucleic-acid-amplification-testing.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads