Response to Letters to the Editor from Irit Sinai "Standard Days Method Effectiveness: opinion disguised as scientific review" and Kelsey Wright, Karen Hardee, and John Townsend "The pitfalls of using selective data to represent the effectiveness, relevance and utility of the Standard Days Method of contraception".

Marston, C; Church, K; (2016) Response to Letters to the Editor from Irit Sinai "Standard Days Method Effectiveness: opinion disguised as scientific review" and Kelsey Wright, Karen Hardee, and John Townsend "The pitfalls of using selective data to represent the effectiveness, relevance and utility of the Standard Days Method of contraception". Contraception. ISSN 0010-7824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.003

Permanent Identifier

Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.003

Abstract

Share

Download

Filename: Reply to SDM letters June 1 2016 author accepted manuscript and figure.pdf

Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0

Download
[img]

Downloads

View details

Metrics & Citations


Google Scholar