Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.


Rücker, G; Schwarzer, G; Carpenter, J; (2007) Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Statistics in medicine, 27 (5). pp. 746-763. ISSN 0277-6715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2971

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

In meta-analyses, it sometimes happens that smaller trials show different, often larger, treatment effects. One possible reason for such 'small study effects' is publication bias. This is said to occur when the chance of a smaller study being published is increased if it shows a stronger effect. Assuming no other small study effects, under the null hypothesis of no publication bias, there should be no association between effect size and effect precision (e.g. inverse standard error) among the trials in a meta-analysis.A number of tests for small study effects/publication bias have been developed. These use either a non-parametric test or a regression test for association between effect size and precision. However, when the outcome is binary, the effect is summarized by the log-risk ratio or log-odds ratio (log OR). Unfortunately, these measures are not independent of their estimated standard error. Consequently, established tests reject the null hypothesis too frequently.We propose new tests based on the arcsine transformation, which stabilizes the variance of binomial random variables. We report results of a simulation study under the Copas model (on the log OR scale) for publication bias, which evaluates tests so far proposed in the literature. This shows that: (i) the size of one of the new tests is comparable to those of the best existing tests, including those recently published; and (ii) among such tests it has slightly greater power, especially when the effect size is small and heterogeneity is present. Arcsine tests have additional advantages that they can include trials with zero events in both arms and that they can be very easily performed using the existing software for regression tests. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Medical Statistics
PubMed ID: 17592831
Web of Science ID: 253782500008
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/9417

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
289Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item