Validity of coital diaries in a feasibility study for the Microbicides Development Programme trial among women at high risk of HIV/AIDS in Mwanza, Tanzania


Allen, CF; Lees, SS; Desmond, NA; der, G; Chiduo, B; Hambleton, I; Knight, L; Vallely, A; Ross, DA; Hayes, RJ; (2007) Validity of coital diaries in a feasibility study for the Microbicides Development Programme trial among women at high risk of HIV/AIDS in Mwanza, Tanzania. Sexually transmitted infections, 83 (6). pp. 490-496. ISSN 1368-4973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2007.024810

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Objectives: To compare coital diaries and face-to-face interviews (FFIs) in measuring sexual behaviour among women at high risk of HIV. To assess the effect of differing levels of support from researchers on reporting in coital diaries and FFIs. Methods: Three groups of 50 women were randomly selected from a cohort of food and recreational facility workers participating in a microbicide trial feasibility study and received differing levels of researcher support. Minimum support involved delivering and collecting coital diaries weekly; medium support included a weekly FFI and discussion of concerns; intensive support also included an unscheduled mid-week visit when diaries were checked and concerns addressed. All respondents participated in an exit FFI, including questions on sexual behaviour over the four-week study period and study acceptability. Results: Sexual behaviours were generally reported more frequently in coital diaries than weekly or exit interviews. Vaginal and anal sex, male and female condom use, vaginal cleaning and lubrication, sex during menstruation and sex with irregular and regular partners were reported more frequently in coital diaries than exit interviews. In coital diaries, level of support was associated with reporting of vaginal sex and cleaning. In exit interviews, support level was associated with reporting of vaginal sex, vaginal cleaning and sex with regular, irregular and commercial partners. Women with minimum support reported least satisfaction with the research process. Women with intensive support were most likely to report that they informed someone about their study participation and that they completed diaries daily. Conclusion: Compared with FFIs, coital diaries resulted in higher reporting of socially stigmatised activities, and sexual behaviour reporting varied less by level of support. More researcher support enhanced study acceptability.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Adult, Anti-Infective Agents, administration & dosage, Coitus, Female, HIV Infections, prevention & control, Humans, Medical Records, Patient Participation, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, prevention & control, Tanzania, epidemiology
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Global Health and Development
Research Centre: Centre for Global Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs)
Tropical Epidemiology Group
Social and Mathematical Epidemiology (SaME)
PubMed ID: 17660325
Web of Science ID: 249868900017
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/8403

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
348Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item