Determining the cost effectiveness of a smoke alarm give-away program using data from a randomized controlled trial


Ginnelly, L; Sculpher, M; Bojke, C; Roberts, I; Wade, A; Diguseppi, C; (2005) Determining the cost effectiveness of a smoke alarm give-away program using data from a randomized controlled trial. European journal of public health, 15 (5). pp. 448-453. ISSN 1101-1262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cki146

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: In 2001, 486 deaths and 17 300 injuries occurred in domestic fires in the UK. Domestic fires represent a significant cost to the UK economy, with the value of property loss alone estimated at 375 pound million in 1999. In 2001 in the US, there were 383 500 home fires, resulting in 3110 deaths, 15 200 injuries and $5.5 billion in direct property damage. Methods: A cluster RCT was conducted to determine whether a smoke alarm give- away program, directed to an inner- city UK population, is effective and cost- effective in reducing the risk of fire- related deaths/ injuries. Forty areas were randomized to the giveaway or control group. The number of injuries/ deaths and the number of fires in each ward were collected prospectively. Cost- effectiveness analysis was undertaken to relate the number of deaths/ injuries to resource use ( damage, fire service, healthcare and giveaway costs). Analytical methods were used which reflected the characteristics of the trial data including the cluster design of the trial and a large number of zero costs and effects. Results: The mean cost for a household in a give- away ward, including the cost of the program, was 12.76 pound, compared to 10.74 pound for the control ward. The total mean number of deaths and injuries was greater in the intervention wards then the control wards, 6.45 and 5.17. When an injury/ death avoided is valued at 1000 pound, a smoke alarm give- away has a probability of being cost effective of 0.15. Conclusions: A smoke alarm give- away program, as administered in the trial, is unlikely to represent a cost- effective use of resources.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: CLINICAL-TRIAL, INJURIES, Cluster Analysis, Cost-Benefit Analysis, statistics & numerical data, England, epidemiology, Equipment Failure, economics, Humans, Mortality, trends, Program Evaluation, economics, Smoke, adverse effects, Wounds and Injuries, prevention & control
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Population Health (2012- ) > Dept of Nutrition and Public Health Interventions Research (2003-2012)
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Population Health (2012- )
Research Centre: Centre for Global Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs)
PubMed ID: 16150815
Web of Science ID: 232595200005
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/6404

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
317Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item