Clinicians' views of formats of performance comparisons.


Allwood, D; Hildon, Z; Black, N; (2011) Clinicians' views of formats of performance comparisons. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 19 (1). pp. 86-93. ISSN 1356-1294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01777.x

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Comparisons of the performance of health care providers are increasingly being used. Despite one key audience being clinicians, there has been little research on the format and content of such comparisons. Our aim was to explore clinicians' comprehension and preferences of format and content in displaying provider outcomes using comparisons of patient reported outcome measures data.<br/> METHOD: A qualitative study, based on seven meetings involving 107 clinicians (mostly consultant and junior doctors, and nurses), revealed their views on nine formats and five aspects of content.<br/> RESULTS: Key findings were the desire for data in more than one format, explicit display of comparative performance (rank order) and the need for explanations (e.g. of unfamiliar formats and of statistical uncertainty).<br/> CONCLUSIONS: Several themes were identified that shaped clinicians' views. Results were sufficiently clear to permit recommendations for the form and content of standard reports for the National Health Service.<br/>

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Health Services Research and Policy
PubMed ID: 22098070
Web of Science ID: 314114400013
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/54660

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
271Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item