Combining indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated net interventions.


Kleinschmidt, I; Schwabe, C; Shiva, M; Segura, JL; Sima, V; Mabunda, SJ; Coleman, M; (2009) Combining indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated net interventions. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 81 (3). pp. 519-24. ISSN 0002-9637

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
License:

Download (43kB) | Preview

Abstract

: Does scaling up of malaria control by combining indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) enhance protection to populations? Results from a literature search and from recent household surveys in Bioko, Equatorial Guinea, and Zambezia, Mozambique are presented. Five out of eight previous studies reported a reduced risk of infection in those protected by both interventions compared with one intervention alone. Surveys in Bioko and Zambezia showed strong evidence of a protective effect of IRS combined with nets relative to IRS alone (odds ratio [OR] = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59-0.86 for Bioko, and OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.50-0.79, for Zambezia). The effect of both interventions combined, compared with those who had neither, was OR = 0.46, (95% CI = 0.76-0.81) in Bioko and 0.34 (95% CI = 0.21-0.56) in Zambezia. Although the effects of confounding cannot be excluded, these results provide encouragement that the additional resources for combining IRS and LLIN are justified.<br/>

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Research Centre: Malaria Centre
Tropical Epidemiology Group
PubMed ID: 19706925
Web of Science ID: 269290900029
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4957

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
3Downloads
298Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item