Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial

Powell, JT; Braithwaite, B; Cheshire, NJ; Greenhalgh, RM; Grieve, RD; Hassan, TB; Hinchliffe, RJ; Howell, S; Moore, F; Nicholson, AA; +3 more... Thompson, MM; Thompson, SG; Investigators, IT; (2017) Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed), 359. ISSN 0959-8138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4859

Permanent Identifier

Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4859

Abstract

Share

Download

Filename: Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy.pdf

Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0

Download
[img]

Downloads

View details

Metrics & Citations


Google Scholar