Design issues in GMH trials in low resource settings


Weiss, H; (2015) Design issues in GMH trials in low resource settings. In: UNSPECIFIED, (ed.) Global Mental Health Trials. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 55-70. ISBN 9780199680467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199680467.001.0001

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

In this chapter we outline the key principles in design and analysis of trials for mental health. The chapter focuses on randomized controlled trials as these are the gold-standard trial design, which minimizes confounding due to other factors and enables us to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the intervention. Other key principles of trial design discussed in the chapter include methods to develop a clearly stated, testable research hypothesis, definition of well-defined outcomes, appropriate choice of the control condition, masking of providers and participants where possible, realistic sample size estimates, and appropriate data monitoring and statistical analysis plans. The chapter also outlines alternatives to the parallel arm superiority trial design, such as equivalence and non-inferiority trials, cross-over, stepped wedge, fixed adaptive, and patient preference trial designs.

Item Type: Book Section
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Infectious Disease Epidemiology
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4293818

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
11Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item