Cost-effectiveness of initial stress cardiovascular MR, stress SPECT or stress echocardiography as a gate-keeper test, compared with upfront invasive coronary angiography in the investigation and management of patients with stable chest pain: mid-term outcomes from the CECaT randomised controlled trial.

Thom, H; West, NE; Hughes, V; Dyer, M; Buxton, M; Sharples, LD; Jackson, CH; Crean, AM; CECaT study group; , COLLABORATORS; +17 more... Armstrong, J; Buxton, M; Caine, N; Coulden, R; Crean, A; Dyer, M; Gillham, M; Goddard, H; Goldsmith, K; Hughes, V; Lee, E; Patel, R; Schofield, P; Sharples, L; Sonnex, E; Stone, D; Treacy, C; (2014) Cost-effectiveness of initial stress cardiovascular MR, stress SPECT or stress echocardiography as a gate-keeper test, compared with upfront invasive coronary angiography in the investigation and management of patients with stable chest pain: mid-term outcomes from the CECaT randomised controlled trial. BMJ open, 4 (2). e003419. ISSN 2044-6055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003419

Permanent Identifier

Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003419

Abstract

Share

Download

Filename: bmjopen-2013-003419.PMC3918982.pdf

Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0

Download
[img]

Downloads

View details

Metrics & Citations


Google Scholar