Stage at diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival: evidence from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.

Camille Maringe ORCID logo ; Sarah Walters ORCID logo ; John Butler ; Michel P Coleman ORCID logo ; Neville Hacker ; Louise Hanna ; Berit J Mosgaard ; Andy Nordin ; Barry Rosen ; Gerda Engholm ; +11 more... Marianne L Gjerstorff ; Juanita Hatcher ; Tom B Johannesen ; Colleen E McGahan ; David Meechan ; Richard Middleton ; Elizabeth Tracey ; Donna Turner ; Michael A Richards ; Bernard Rachet ORCID logo ; ICBP Module 1 Working Group ; (2012) Stage at diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival: evidence from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership. Gynecologic oncology, 127 (1). pp. 75-82. ISSN 0090-8258 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.033
Copy

OBJECTIVE: We investigate what role stage at diagnosis bears in international differences in ovarian cancer survival. METHODS: Data from population-based cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, and the UK were analysed for 20,073 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer during 2004-07. We compare the stage distribution between countries and estimate stage-specific one-year net survival and the excess hazard up to 18 months after diagnosis, using flexible parametric models on the log cumulative excess hazard scale. RESULTS: One-year survival was 69% in the UK, 72% in Denmark and 74-75% elsewhere. In Denmark, 74% of patients were diagnosed with FIGO stages III-IV disease, compared to 60-70% elsewhere. International differences in survival were evident at each stage of disease; women in the UK had lower survival than in the other four countries for patients with FIGO stages III-IV disease (61.4% vs. 65.8-74.4%). International differences were widest for older women and for those with advanced stage or with no stage data. CONCLUSION: Differences in stage at diagnosis partly explain international variation in ovarian cancer survival, and a more adverse stage distribution contributes to comparatively low survival in Denmark. This could arise because of differences in tumour biology, staging procedures or diagnostic delay. Differences in survival also exist within each stage, as illustrated by lower survival for advanced disease in the UK, suggesting unequal access to optimal treatment. Population-based data on cancer survival by stage are vital for cancer surveillance, and global consensus is needed to make stage data in cancer registries more consistent.


picture_as_pdf
CM_combined_pages.pdf
subject
Accepted Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0

View Download
picture_as_pdf

Supplemental Material

picture_as_pdf

Supplemental Material


Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads