Behind the scenes of the PRIME intervention: designing a complex intervention to improve malaria care at public health centres in Uganda.


DiLiberto, DD; Staedke, SG; Nankya, F; Maiteki-Sebuguzi, C; Taaka, L; Nayiga, S; Kamya, MR; Haaland, A; Chandler, CI; (2015) Behind the scenes of the PRIME intervention: designing a complex intervention to improve malaria care at public health centres in Uganda. Global health action, 8 (1). p. 29067. ISSN 1654-9716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.29067

[img]
Preview
Text - Published Version
License:

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
License:

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background In Uganda, health system challenges limit access to good quality healthcare and contribute to slow progress on malaria control. We developed a complex intervention (PRIME), which was designed to improve quality of care for malaria at public health centres. Objective Responding to calls for increased transparency, we describe the PRIME intervention's design process, rationale, and final content and reflect on the choices and challenges encountered during the design of this complex intervention. Design To develop the intervention, we followed a multistep approach, including the following: 1) formative research to identify intervention target areas and objectives; 2) prioritization of intervention components; 3) review of relevant evidence; 4) development of intervention components; 5) piloting and refinement of workshop modules; and 6) consolidation of the PRIME intervention theories of change to articulate why and how the intervention was hypothesized to produce desired outcomes. We aimed to develop an intervention that was evidence-based, grounded in theory, and appropriate for the study context; could be evaluated within a randomized controlled trial; and had the potential to be scaled up sustainably. Results The process of developing the PRIME intervention package was lengthy and dynamic. The final intervention package consisted of four components: 1) training in fever case management and use of rapid diagnostic tests for malaria (mRDTs); 2) workshops in health centre management; 3) workshops in patient-centred services; and 4) provision of mRDTs and antimalarials when stocks ran low. Conclusions The slow and iterative process of intervention design contrasted with the continually shifting study context. We highlight the considerations and choices made at each design stage, discussing elements we included and why, as well as those that were ultimately excluded. Reflection on and reporting of 'behind the scenes' accounts of intervention design may improve the design, assessment, and generalizability of complex interventions and their evaluations.

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases > Dept of Clinical Research
Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Global Health and Development
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Medical Statistics
Research Centre: Malaria Centre
PubMed ID: 28156842
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/3470337

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
19Downloads
67Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item