Response to Letters to the Editor from Irit Sinai "Standard Days Method Effectiveness: opinion disguised as scientific review" and Kelsey Wright, Karen Hardee, and John Townsend "The pitfalls of using selective data to represent the effectiveness, relevance and utility of the Standard Days Method of contraception".


Marston, C; Church, K; (2016) Response to Letters to the Editor from Irit Sinai "Standard Days Method Effectiveness: opinion disguised as scientific review" and Kelsey Wright, Karen Hardee, and John Townsend "The pitfalls of using selective data to represent the effectiveness, relevance and utility of the Standard Days Method of contraception". Contraception. ISSN 0010-7824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.003

This is the latest version of this item. Earlier version may have full text manuscript

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
License:

Download (162kB) | Preview
Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Social and Environmental Health Research
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Population Health (2012- )
Research Centre: Population Studies Group
PubMed ID: 27318005
Web of Science ID: 384033000015
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2572238

Available Versions of this Item

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
5Downloads
53Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item