Outcome modelling strategies in epidemiology: traditional methods and basic alternatives.

Greenland, S; Daniel, R; Pearce, N; (2016) Outcome modelling strategies in epidemiology: traditional methods and basic alternatives. International journal of epidemiology, 45 (2). pp. 565-75. ISSN 0300-5771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw040

Text - Published Version

Download (354kB) | Preview
Text - Accepted Version

Download (512kB) | Preview


: Controlling for too many potential confounders can lead to or aggravate problems of data sparsity or multicollinearity, particularly when the number of covariates is large in relation to the study size. As a result, methods to reduce the number of modelled covariates are often deployed. We review several traditional modelling strategies, including stepwise regression and the 'change-in-estimate' (CIE) approach to deciding which potential confounders to include in an outcome-regression model for estimating effects of a targeted exposure. We discuss their shortcomings, and then provide some basic alternatives and refinements that do not require special macros or programming. Throughout, we assume the main goal is to derive the most accurate effect estimates obtainable from the data and commercial software. Allowing that most users must stay within standard software packages, this goal can be roughly approximated using basic methods to assess, and thereby minimize, mean squared error (MSE).<br/>

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Medical Statistics
Research Centre: Centre for Statistical Methodology
PubMed ID: 27097747
Web of Science ID: 376660300035
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2545318


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item