Should Stroke Trials Adjust Functional Outcome for Baseline Prognostic Factors?


Gray, LJ; Bath, PM; Collier, T; The Optimising the Analysis of Stroke Trials (OAST) Collaboratio, ; (2009) Should Stroke Trials Adjust Functional Outcome for Baseline Prognostic Factors? Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation, 40 (3). pp. 888-94. ISSN 0039-2499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.519207

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Many stroke trials have provided neutral results. Suboptimal statistical analyses may be failing to detect effective interventions. Adjusting outcomes for baseline prognostic factors in the analysis may improve the efficiency of analysis of outcomes. METHODS: Data from 23 stroke trials (25 674 patients) assessing functional outcome were included. The prognostic variables considered were age, sex, and baseline severity. Unadjusted and adjusted ordinal logistic regression models were compared using simulated data from each trial (10 000 simulations per trial). Three levels of treatment effect were assessed with ORs of 0.95, 0.74, and 0.57. The reduction in sample size gained from using the adjusted models, as compared with an unadjusted model, was then calculated as a reflection of the increase in statistical power. RESULTS: Adjusting outcome for baseline factors led to a reduction in sample size, which was similar across all 3 treatment effects (median percentage reduction, interquartile range): OR=0.95: 35.3% (21.0 to 42.1); OR=0.74: 38.4% (29.4 to 42.7); and OR=0.57: 38.4% (27.4 to 42.2). As the treatment effect increased, the proportion of simulations in which the treatment effect for the adjusted model was greater than for the unadjusted model also increased. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting for prognostic factors in stroke trials can reduce sample size by at least 20% to 30% (the lower interquartile range) for a given power. Conversely, trialists may want to power for an unadjusted analysis and then increase statistical power by adjusting for prognostic factors.

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Medical Statistics
PubMed ID: 19164798
Web of Science ID: 263590200051
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/24103

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
273Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item