Do case-only designs yield consistent results across design and different databases? A case study of hip fractures and benzodiazepines.


Requena, G; Logie, J; Martin, E; Boudiaf, N; González González, R; Huerta, C; Alvarez, A; Webb, D; Bate, A; García Rodríguez, LA; Reynolds, R; Schlienger, R; Gardarsdottir, H; de Groot, M; Klungel, OH; de Abajo, F; Douglas, IJ; (2015) Do case-only designs yield consistent results across design and different databases? A case study of hip fractures and benzodiazepines. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. ISSN 1053-8569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3822

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
License:

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

The case-crossover (CXO) and self-controlled case series (SCCS) designs are increasingly used in pharmacoepidemiology. In both, relative risk estimates are obtained within persons, implicitly controlling for time-fixed confounding variables. To examine the consistency of relative risk estimates of hip/femur fractures (HFF) associated with the use of benzodiazepines (BZD) across case-only designs in two databases (DBs), when a common protocol was applied. CXO and SCCS studies were conducted in BIFAP (Spain) and CPRD (UK). Exposure to BZD was divided into non-use, current, recent and past use. For CXO, odds ratios (OR; 95%CI) of current use versus non-use/past were estimated using conditional logistic regression adjusted for co-medications (AOR). For the SCCS, conditional Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR; 95%CI) of current use versus non/past-use, adjusted for age. To investigate possible event-exposure dependence the relative risk in the 30 days prior to first BZD exposure was also evaluated. In the CXO current use of BZD was associated with an increased risk of HFF in both DBs, AORBIFAP  = 1.47 (1.29-1.67) and AORCPRD  = 1.55 (1.41-1.70). In the SCCS, IRRs for current exposure was 0.79 (0.72-0.86) in BIFAP and 1.21 (1.13-1.30) in CPRD. However, when we considered separately the 30-day pre-exposure period, the IRR for current period was 1.43 (1.31-1.57) in BIFAP and 1.37 (1.27-1.47) in CPRD. CXO designs yielded consistent results across DBs, while initial SCCS analyses did not. Accounting for event-exposure dependence, estimates derived from SCCS were more consistent across DBs and designs. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology
Research Centre: EHR Research Group
Related URLs:
PubMed ID: 26112821
Web of Science ID: 373607500009
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2220289

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
155Downloads
294Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item