Understanding cost of care for patients on renal replacement therapy: looking beyond fixed tariffs.


Li, B; Cairns, JA; Fotheringham, J; Tomson, CR; Forsythe, JL; Watson, C; Metcalfe, W; Fogarty, DG; Draper, H; Oniscu, GC; Dudley, C; Johnson, RJ; Roderick, P; Leydon, G; Bradley, JA; Ravanan, R; (2015) Understanding cost of care for patients on renal replacement therapy: looking beyond fixed tariffs. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 30 (10). pp. 1726-34. ISSN 0931-0509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfv224

This is the latest version of this item. Earlier version may have full text manuscript

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
License:

Download (458kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a number of countries, reimbursement to hospitals providing renal dialysis services is set according to a fixed tariff. While the cost of maintenance dialysis and transplant surgery are amenable to a system of fixed tariffs, patients with established renal failure commonly present with comorbid conditions that can lead to variations in the need for hospitalization beyond the provision of renal replacement therapy.<br/> METHODS: Patient-level cost data for incident renal replacement therapy patients in England were obtained as a result of linkage of the Hospital Episodes Statistics dataset to UK Renal Registry data. Regression models were developed to explore variations in hospital costs in relation to treatment modality, number of years on treatment and factors such as age and comorbidities. The final models were then used to predict annual costs for patients with different sets of characteristics.<br/> RESULTS: Excluding the cost of renal replacement therapy itself, inpatient costs generally decreased with number of years on treatment for haemodialysis and transplant patients, whereas costs for patients receiving peritoneal dialysis remained constant. Diabetes was associated with higher mean annual costs for all patients irrespective of treatment modality and hospital setting. Age did not have a consistent effect on costs.<br/> CONCLUSIONS: Combining predicted hospital costs with the fixed costs of renal replacement therapy showed that the total cost differential for a patient continuing on dialysis rather than receiving a transplant is considerable following the first year of renal replacement therapy, thus reinforcing the longer-term economic advantage of transplantation over dialysis for the health service.<br/>

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Health Services Research and Policy
PubMed ID: 26071229
Web of Science ID: 363171900018
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2210881

Available Versions of this Item

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
5Downloads
339Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item