Ionisers for chronic asthma


Blackhall, K; Appleton, S; Cates, CJ; (2012) Ionisers for chronic asthma. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online), 9 (9). CD002986. ISSN 1469-493X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002986.pub2

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

: Previous reports have shown that ion content in the air may have an effect on respiratory function. Results from studies which test the efficacy of air ionisers to reduce asthma symptoms are often inconclusive and their use as a treatment for asthma remains debatable.<br/> : We conducted a systematic review of the available evidence to determine the effectiveness of positive and negative ion generators in people with asthma.<br/> : We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) as well as the alternative medicine database AMED. Searches were current as of June 2012.<br/> : Randomised controlled trials (parallel or crossover design studies) comparing ionisers with dummy ionisers (being negative or positive ion emitters), in children or adults with chronic asthma.<br/> : Two reviewers independently assessed titles and abstracts of studies and assessed trial quality. Study quality was determined using two methods:The Cochrane approach to allocation concealment and the five point Jadad scale.<br/> : Six studies were selected for inclusion (106 participants). No results were combined as the studies were all of a crossover design.EFFECTS OF NEGATIVE ION GENERATORS (five studies) No study reported a significant difference in lung function between ionised and control air (morning Peak expiratory flow (PEF) - three studies; forced expiratory flow in one second (FEV1) - one study). There were no significant differences in symptoms or beta-2 agonist usage between ionised and control air in three studies.EFFECTS OF POSITIVE ION GENERATORS (one study) This study demonstrated that although positively ionised air was associated with a larger fall in FEV1 with exercise, this did not reach statistical significance. Baseline FEV1 was not demonstrated to be significantly different between treatment groups.<br/> : Based on the evidence currently available from randomised controlled trials, a recommendation cannot be given for the use of room air ionisers to reduce symptoms in patients with chronic asthma.<br/>

Item Type: Article
Keywords: anion, cation, ion, adolescent, adult, air, asthma, child, crossover procedure, human, infant, preschool child, randomized controlled trial (topic), review, Air Ionization, Anions, Cations, Child, Preschool, Cross-Over Studies, Humans, Ions, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Young Adult, Adolescent, Adult, Air Ionization, Anions, therapeutic use, Asthma, therapy, Cations, therapeutic use, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Over Studies, Humans, Infant, Ions, therapeutic use, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Young Adult
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Population Health (2012- ) > Dept of Nutrition and Public Health Interventions Research (2003-2012)
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Population Health (2012- )
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Medical Statistics
PubMed ID: 22972060
Web of Science ID: 308829500005
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2064783

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
295Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item