Validating abbreviated measures of effort-reward imbalance at work in European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium


Siegrist, J; Dragano, N; Nyberg, ST; Lunau, T; Alfredsson, L; Erbel, R; Fahlén, G; Goldberg, M; Jöckel, KH; Knutsson, A; Leineweber, C; Magnusson Hanson, LL; Nordin, M; Rugulies, R; Schupp, J; Singh-Manoux, A; Theorell, T; Wagner, GG; Westerlund, H; Zins, M; Heikkilä, K; Fransson, EI; Kivimäki, M; (2013) Validating abbreviated measures of effort-reward imbalance at work in European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium. International archives of occupational and environmental health, 87 (3). pp. 249-56. ISSN 0340-0131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0855-z

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

: Effort-reward imbalance (ERI) is an established conceptualisation of work stress. Although a validated effort-reward questionnaire is available for public use, many epidemiological studies adopt shortened scales and proxy measures. To examine the agreement between different abbreviated measures and the original instrument, we compared different versions of the effort-reward scales available in 15 European cohort studies participating in the IPD-Work (Individual-participant-data meta-analysis in working populations) consortium.<br/> : Five of the 15 studies provide information on the original ('complete') scales measuring 'effort' and 'reward', whereas the 10 remaining studies used 'partial' scales. To compare different versions of the ERI scales, we analyse individual-level data from 31,790 participants from the five studies with complete scales.<br/> : Pearson's correlation between partial and complete scales was very high in case of 'effort' (where 2 out of 3 items were used) and very high or high in case of 'reward', if at least 4 items (out of 7) were included. Reward scales composed of 3 items revealed good to satisfactory agreement, and in one case, a reward scale consisting of 2 items only demonstrated a modest, but still acceptable degree of agreement. Sensitivity and specificity of a composite measure, the ratio of effort and reward, comparing partial versus complete scales ranged between 59-93 and 85-99 %, respectively. Complete and partial scales were strongly associated with poor self-rated health.<br/> : Our results support the notion that short proxy measures or partial versions of the original scales can be used to assess effort-reward imbalance.<br/>

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Adult, Cohort Studies, Employment/*psychology, Europe/epidemiology, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, *Internal-External Control, Job Satisfaction, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Health/*statistics & numerical data, Psychometrics/*instrumentation/standards, Questionnaires, *Reward, Self Report, Stress, Psychological/epidemiology/*psychology, Workload/*psychology, Adult, Cohort Studies, Employment, psychology, Europe, epidemiology, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Job Satisfaction, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Health, statistics & numerical data, Psychometrics, instrumentation, standards, Questionnaires, Reward, Self Report, Stress, Psychological, epidemiology, psychology, Workload, psychology
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Health Services Research and Policy
PubMed ID: 23456220
Web of Science ID: 332953300003
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2025462

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
278Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item