The practice of 'doing' evaluation: lessons learned from nine complex intervention trials in action.


Reynolds, J; DiLiberto, D; Mangham-Jefferies, L; Ansah, EK; Lal, S; Mbakilwa, H; Bruxvoort, K; Webster, J; Vestergaard, LS; Yeung, S; Leslie, T; Hutchinson, E; Reyburn, H; Lalloo, DG; Schellenberg, D; Cundill, B; Staedke, SG; Wiseman, V; Goodman, C; Chandler, CI; (2014) The practice of 'doing' evaluation: lessons learned from nine complex intervention trials in action. Implement Sci, 9. p. 75. ISSN 1748-5908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-75

[img]
Preview
Text - Published Version
License:

Download (328kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text - Published Version
License:

Download (145kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is increasing recognition among trialists of the challenges in understanding how particular 'real-life' contexts influence the delivery and receipt of complex health interventions. Evaluations of interventions to change health worker and/or patient behaviours in health service settings exemplify these challenges. When interpreting evaluation data, deviation from intended intervention implementation is accounted for through process evaluations of fidelity, reach, and intensity. However, no such systematic approach has been proposed to account for the way evaluation activities may deviate in practice from assumptions made when data are interpreted. METHODS A collective case study was conducted to explore experiences of undertaking evaluation activities in the real-life contexts of nine complex intervention trials seeking to improve appropriate diagnosis and treatment of malaria in varied health service settings. Multiple sources of data were used, including in-depth interviews with investigators, participant-observation of studies, and rounds of discussion and reflection. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION From our experiences of the realities of conducting these evaluations, we identified six key 'lessons learned' about ways to become aware of and manage aspects of the fabric of trials involving the interface of researchers, fieldworkers, participants and data collection tools that may affect the intended production of data and interpretation of findings. These lessons included: foster a shared understanding across the study team of how individual practices contribute to the study goals; promote and facilitate within-team communications for ongoing reflection on the progress of the evaluation; establish processes for ongoing collaboration and dialogue between sub-study teams; the importance of a field research coordinator bridging everyday project management with scientific oversight; collect and review reflective field notes on the progress of the evaluation to aid interpretation of outcomes; and these approaches should help the identification of and reflection on possible overlaps between the evaluation and intervention. CONCLUSION The lessons we have drawn point to the principle of reflexivity that, we argue, needs to become part of standard practice in the conduct of evaluations of complex interventions to promote more meaningful interpretations of the effects of an intervention and to better inform future implementation and decision-making.

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Global Health and Development
Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Social and Environmental Health Research
Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases > Dept of Disease Control
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases > Dept of Clinical Research
Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Health Services Research and Policy
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Medical Statistics
Research Centre: Centre for Evaluation
Tropical Epidemiology Group
PubMed ID: 24935096
Web of Science ID: 338373500001
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/1823814

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
623Downloads
459Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item