Does waiting for total hip replacement matter? Prospective cohort study


Hajat, S; Fitzpatrick, R; Morris, R; Reeves, B; Rigge, M; Williams, O; Murray, D; Gregg, P; (2002) Does waiting for total hip replacement matter? Prospective cohort study. Journal of health services research & policy, 7 (1). pp. 19-25. ISSN 1355-8196

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact on the outcome of total hip replacement of the length of timing spent waiting for surgery. METHODS: One hundred and forty-three orthopaedic and general hospitals provided information about aspects of surgical practice for each total hip replacement conducted between September 1996 and October 1997 for publicly and privately funded operations in five English health regions. These data were linked to patient information about hip-related pain and disability status (measured using the Oxford Hip Score) before operation and at 3 and 12 months after. Data were analysed using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by surgeons for 10,410 (78%) patients treated during the recruitment period and by 7151 (54%) patients. Twelve months after total hip replacement, the majority of patients experienced substantial improvements in hip-related pain and disability (as measured by the Oxford Hip Score). Those patients who started with a worse Oxford Hip Score before the operation tended to remain worse after the operation. Worse pre-operative score was associated with an increased length of either outpatient or inpatient wait, and this trend remained after the operation. The relationship between waiting time and outcome remained after adjustment for possible confounding variables. A consistently worse score was observed in public compared with private patients at all three time-points. In addition, in both sectors, those patients who were socially disadvantaged had a worse score than more socially advantaged patients both before and after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Waiting for surgery is associated with worse outcomes 12 months later. Longer-term outcome needs to be considered to see if this association persists.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/*rehabilitation, Cohort Studies, Disability Evaluation, England, Female, Human, London, Male, Middle Age, Osteoarthritis/surgery, Postoperative Complications, Questionnaires, Recovery of Function, Severity of Illness Index, Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Time Factors, *Treatment Outcome, *Waiting Lists, Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, rehabilitation, Cohort Studies, Disability Evaluation, England, Female, Human, London, Male, Middle Age, Osteoarthritis, surgery, Postoperative Complications, Questionnaires, Recovery of Function, Severity of Illness Index, Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Waiting Lists
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Health Services Research and Policy
Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Social and Environmental Health Research
PubMed ID: 11822257
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/17313

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
362Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item