Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial

, UkFlexibleSigmoidoscopyScreeningTrialInvestigators; Cook, C; (2002) Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet, 359 (9314). pp. 1291-300. ISSN 0140-6736 DOI:

Full text not available from this repository.


BACKGROUND: This randomised controlled trial is examining the hypothesis that a single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening offered at around age 60 years can lower the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. We report here on acceptability, safety, feasibility, and yield. METHODS: Men and women aged 55-64 years, in 14 UK centres, who responded to a mailed questionnaire that they would attend for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening if invited, were randomly assigned screening or control (ratio one to two). The control group was not contacted. Small polyps were removed during screening, and colonoscopy was undertaken if high-risk polyps (three or more adenomas, size 1 cm or greater, villous, severely dysplastic, or malignant) were found. FINDINGS: Of 354,262 people asked about their interest in having flexible sigmoidoscopy screening, 194,726 (55%) responded positively, and 170,432 eligible individuals were randomised. Attendance among those assigned screening was 71% (40,674 of 57,254). 2131 (5%) were classified as high-risk and referred for colonoscopy; 38,525 with no polyps or only low-risk polyps detected were discharged. Distal adenomas were detected in 4931 (12.1%) and distal cancer in 131 (0.3%). Proximal adenomas were detected in 386 (18.8% of those undergoing colonoscopy) and proximal cancer in nine cases (0.4%). 62% of cancers were Dukes' stage A or locally excised. There was one perforation after flexible sigmoidoscopy and four after colonoscopy. An average of 48 people were screened, and two or three colonoscopy referrals generated, per centre each week.Interpretation Our flexible sigmoidoscopy screening regimen is acceptable, feasible, and safe. The prevalence of neoplasia is high, and colonoscopy referral rates of 5% are acceptable.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Adenoma/diagnosis/epidemiology/*prevention & control, Colonic Polyps/diagnosis/pathology, Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis/epidemiology/*prevention & control, Feasibility Studies, Female, Great Britain/epidemiology, Human, Incidence, Male, Middle Age, *Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Questionnaires, *Sigmoidoscopy, Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Adenoma, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention & control, Colonic Polyps, diagnosis, pathology, Colorectal Neoplasms, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention & control, Feasibility Studies, Female, Great Britain, epidemiology, Human, Incidence, Male, Middle Age, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Questionnaires, Sigmoidoscopy, Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Infectious Disease Epidemiology
PubMed ID: 11965274
Web of Science ID: 174989700011


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item