Investment case for improving maternal and child health: results from four countries.


Jimenez Soto, E; La Vincente, S; Clark, A; Firth, S; Morgan, A; Dettrick, Z; Dayal, P; Aldaba, BM; Kosen, S; Kraft, AD; Panicker, R; Prasai, Y; Trisnantoro, L; Varghese, B; Widiati, Y; Investment Case Team for India, Indonesia, Nepal, Papua New Guin; (2013) Investment case for improving maternal and child health: results from four countries. BMC Public Health, 13. p. 601. ISSN 1471-2458 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-601

[img]
Preview
Text - Published Version
License:

Download (382Kb) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND Without addressing the constraints specific to disadvantaged populations, national health policies such as universal health coverage risk increasing equity gaps. Health system constraints often have the greatest impact on disadvantaged populations, resulting in poor access to quality health services among vulnerable groups. METHODS The Investment Cases in Indonesia, Nepal, Philippines, and the state of Orissa in India were implemented to support evidence-based sub-national planning and budgeting for equitable scale-up of quality MNCH services. The Investment Case framework combines the basic setup of strategic problem solving with a decision-support model. The analysis and identification of strategies to scale-up priority MNCH interventions is conducted by in-country planners and policymakers with facilitation from local and international research partners. RESULTS Significant variation in scaling-up constraints, strategies, and associated costs were identified between countries and across urban and rural typologies. Community-based strategies have been considered for rural populations served predominantly by public providers, but this analysis suggests that the scaling-up of maternal, newborn, and child health services requires health system interventions focused on 'getting the basics right'. These include upgrading or building facilities, training and redistribution of staff, better supervision, and strengthening the procurement of essential commodities. Some of these strategies involve substantial early capital expenditure in remote and sparsely populated districts. These supply-side strategies are not only the 'best buys', but also the 'required buys' to ensure the quality of health services as coverage increases. By contrast, such public supply strategies may not be the 'best buys' in densely populated urbanised settings, served by a mix of public and private providers. Instead, robust regulatory and supervisory mechanisms are required to improve the accessibility and quality of services delivered by the private sector. They can lead to important maternal mortality reductions at relatively low costs. CONCLUSIONS National strategies that do not take into consideration the special circumstances of disadvantaged areas risk disempowering local managers and may lead to a "business-as-usual" acceptance of unreachable goals. To effectively guide health service delivery at a local level, national plans should adopt typologies that reflect the different problems and strategies to scale up key MNCH interventions.

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Health Services Research and Policy
PubMed ID: 23800035
Web of Science ID: 321280100001
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/1239844

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
619Downloads
279Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item