A systematic review of instruments that assess the implementation of hospital quality management systems.


Groene, O; Botje, D; Suñol, R; Lopez, MA; Wagner, C; (2013) A systematic review of instruments that assess the implementation of hospital quality management systems. International journal for quality in health care, 25 (5). pp. 525-541. ISSN 1353-4505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzt058

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

PURPOSE /st> Health-care providers invest substantial resources to establish and implement hospital quality management systems. Nevertheless, few tools are available to assess implementation efforts and their effect on quality and safety outcomes. This review aims to (i) identify instruments to assess the implementation of hospital quality management systems, (ii) describe their measurement properties and (iii) assess the effects of quality management on quality improvement and quality of care outcomes. DATA SOURCES /st> We performed a systematic literature search from 1990 to 2011 in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. In addition, we used snowball strategies, screened the reference lists of eligible papers, reviewed grey literature and contacted experts in the field. STUDY SELECTION and data extraction Two reviewers screened eligible papers based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and all authors extracted data. Eligible papers are described in terms of general characteristics (settings, type and level of respondents, mode of data collection), methodological properties (sampling strategy, item derivation, conceptualization of quality management, assessment of reliability and validity, scoring) and application/implementation (accounting for context, organizational adaptations, sensitivity to change, deployment and effect size). RESULTS /st> Eighteen papers were deemed eligible for inclusion. While some common domains emerged in measurement conceptualization, substantial differences in scope persist. The instruments' measurement properties were insufficiently described and only few instruments assessed links between the implementation of quality management systems (QMS) and improvement strategies or outcomes. CONCLUSIONS /st> There is currently no well-established measure to assess the implementation and effectiveness of quality management systems. Future research should address this gap.

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Health Services Research and Policy
PubMed ID: 23970437
Web of Science ID: 325501000006
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/1236370

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
347Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item